Topic summary
⁠44%3 analyzed articles/videos2,891 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ferran Torres results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 1,610 hits. Analysis detected 7,045 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,673 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (10,236 of 16,562 topics). This Ferran Torres is better (less manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Ferran Torres
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,673
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510038.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.3%5.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.6%18.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos