Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,929 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fema Funding results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.7% saturation with 1,731 hits. Analysis detected 8,136 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,037 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,424 of 16,562 topics). This Fema Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group.
Fema Funding
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,037
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510073.3% percentile
4.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 12.9%12.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 28.7%28.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 11.0%11.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.0%7.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 28.7%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 25.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos