Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video112 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fees results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 265 faulty-reasoning hits from 448 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,700 of 16,246 topics). This Fees is worse (more manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group.
Fees
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 448
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510089.5% percentile
8.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles448 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.5%14.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 13.8%13.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.3%8.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.3%8.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos