Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video4,440 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federalist Society results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 1,927 hits. Analysis detected 11,302 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,760 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (15,017 of 16,558 topics). This Federalist Society is better (less manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group.
Federalist Society
Topic details
Total words: 17,760
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

9% percentile
02550751009.3% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles17.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.8%10.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos