Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos1,148 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Workforce results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 1,668 hits. Analysis detected 11,109 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,199 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,615 of 16,562 topics). This Federal Workforce is worse (more manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group.
Federal Workforce
Topic details
Total words: 6,199
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.1% percentile
4.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 26.9%26.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 6.0%6.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.5%11.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.0%11.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 25.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Horn Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos