Topic summary
27% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,418 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal State Relations results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 1,827 hits . Analysis detected 15,935 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,874 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (15,340 of 16,562 topics). This Federal State Relations is better (less manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group. Federal State Relations
Topic details
Total words: 22,874
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score7 analyzed articles22.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst