Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Federal Reserve System results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 59% saturation with 158 hits. Analysis detected 676 faulty-reasoning hits from 268 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,335 topics). This Federal Reserve System is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Federal Reserve System
Topic details
Total words: 268
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles268 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 47.0%47.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 59.0%59.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 35.8%35.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 23.9%23.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 23.9%23.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 7.5%7.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 31.3%31.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.9%11.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 11.9%11.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Topic 59.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 47.0%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 35.8%, sitewide 3.3%Framing Effect: Topic 31.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 23.9%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 23.9%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos