Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video834 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Regulations results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Slippery Slope, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 1,086 hits. Analysis detected 6,642 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (3,094 of 16,562 topics). This Federal Regulations is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group.
Federal Regulations
Topic details
Total words: 3,336
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510081.3% percentile
5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 32.5%32.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 14.5%14.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.7%16.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.9%9.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.7%13.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.8%12.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 12.3%12.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.8%10.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 32.5%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos