Topic summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video985 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Regulation results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.8% saturation with 821 hits. Analysis detected 4,394 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,955 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (3,211 of 16,562 topics). This Federal Regulation is worse (more manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group.
Federal Regulation
Topic details
Total words: 2,955
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510080.6% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 27.8%27.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.9%6.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 11.0%11.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 5.6%5.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 24.0%24.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 27.8%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 24.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos