Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video758 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Plaza results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 745 hits. Analysis detected 3,444 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,032 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,483 of 16,562 topics). This Federal Plaza is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
Federal Plaza
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠79%Federal Plaza (selected)6%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,032
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510079.0% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.1%19.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.6%24.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.6%6.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.9%12.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos