Topic summary
⁠45%2 analyzed articles/videos1,572 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Lawsuits results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 537 hits. Analysis detected 4,981 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,603 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (11,091 of 16,562 topics). This Federal Lawsuits is better (less manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group.
Federal Lawsuits
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,603
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510033.0% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos