Author summary
24%2 analyzed articles/videos1,816 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chip Brownlee results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 304 hits. Analysis detected 3,309 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,448 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 23% (5,070 of 6,547 authors). This Chip Brownlee is better (less manipulative) than 77.40% of the peer group.
Chip Brownlee
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
23%Chip Brownlee (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,448
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

23% percentile
025507510022.6% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.6%4.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate