Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,390 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Lawsuit results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 1,987 hits. Analysis detected 9,374 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,103 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (8,069 of 16,562 topics). This Federal Lawsuit is worse (more manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group.
Federal Lawsuit
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,103
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.3% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.8%21.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 5.2%5.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos