Topic summary
⁠28%1 analyzed article/video301 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Intervention results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 204 hits. Analysis detected 458 faulty-reasoning hits from 903 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,705 of 16,562 topics). This Federal Intervention is worse (more manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group.
Federal Intervention
Topic details
Total words: 903
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510089.7% percentile
8.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles903 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.7%5.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 22.6%22.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 5.9%5.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.6%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos