Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video1,062 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fed Rate Decisions results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.5% saturation with 663 hits. Analysis detected 3,092 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,329 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ā 81% (3,180 of 16,562 topics). This Fed Rate Decisions is worse (more manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group.
Fed Rate Decisions
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 81%Fed Rate Decisions (selected)6%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,329
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510080.8% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 21.6%21.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 15.2%15.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 28.5%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 4.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos