Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,216 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fda Approval Process results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 954 hits. Analysis detected 5,427 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,864 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (13,791 of 16,562 topics). This Fda Approval Process is better (less manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group.
Fda Approval Process
Topic details
Total words: 8,864
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510016.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.8%10.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos