Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos858 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fda Approval results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 958 hits. Analysis detected 8,933 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,360 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (9,348 of 16,562 topics). This Fda Approval is better (less manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
Fda Approval
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,360
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510043.6% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.5%11.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.1%11.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos