Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Fbi Informant Tactics results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 272 hits. Analysis detected 1,196 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 15,771 topics). This Fbi Informant Tactics is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Fbi Informant Tactics
Topic details
Total words: 3,120
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos