Topic summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video494 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fauci Diary results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 33.8% saturation with 668 hits. Analysis detected 4,154 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,976 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (2,331 of 22,275 topics). This Fauci Diary is worse (more manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group.
Fauci Diary
Topic details
Total words: 1,976
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510089.5% percentile
7.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 25.5%25.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 27.2%27.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 22.1%22.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.0%13.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.1%12.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 33.8%33.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 12.6%12.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 33.8%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 27.2%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 25.5%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.3%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos