Topic summary
4%1 analyzed article/video207 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fatal Crashes results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Biased Writer Voice, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 185 faulty-reasoning hits from 621 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 57% (7,177 of 16,562 topics). This Fatal Crashes is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Fatal Crashes
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 621
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510056.7% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles621 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 5.6%5.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.2%5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 5.2%5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 4.8%4.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos