Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video477 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fare Evasion results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 266 hits. Analysis detected 1,553 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (6,984 of 16,562 topics). This Fare Evasion is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
Fare Evasion
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,908
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.8% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.9%13.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Horn Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos