Topic summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video1,835 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Far Right Extremism results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 633 hits. Analysis detected 5,635 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,505 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (10,850 of 16,562 topics). This Far Right Extremism is better (less manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group.
Far Right Extremism
Topic details
Total words: 5,505
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510034.5% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.5%11.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.8%6.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.0%Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos