Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,553 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fantasy results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 426 hits . Analysis detected 4,377 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,739 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (15,314 of 16,562 topics). This Fantasy is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group. Fantasy
Topic details
Total words: 7,739
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst