Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video640 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fandom In Politics results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.8% saturation with 763 hits. Analysis detected 3,571 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (5,017 of 16,562 topics). This Fandom In Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group.
Fandom In Politics
Topic details
Total words: 2,560
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.7% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 29.8%29.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 22.7%22.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.6%10.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.1%7.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 22.7%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos