Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Fan Projects results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and In-Group Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39.5% saturation with 393 hits. Analysis detected 1,887 faulty-reasoning hits from 996 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Fan Projects is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Fan Projects
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
ā 0%Fan Projects (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 996
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles996 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 39.5%39.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.5%18.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 23.3%23.3%Representativeness Heurisā€¦Sitewide 1.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 39.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 23.3%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos