Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video318 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Family Drama results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 33.5% saturation with 213 hits. Analysis detected 1,535 faulty-reasoning hits from 636 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11% and a BS Rank of 94% (1,061 of 16,562 topics). This Family Drama is worse (more manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group.
Family Drama
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 636
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

94% percentile
025507510093.6% percentile
11.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles636 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 33.5%33.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 29.4%29.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 17.0%17.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 18.6%18.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 15.9%15.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 14.9%14.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.8%19.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.4%7.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Topic 33.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 29.4%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 4.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Personal Incredulity: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Halo EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos