Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Fame results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Halo Effect, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 539 hits. Analysis detected 3,562 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,174 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,689 topics). This Fame is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Fame
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,174
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 12.8%12.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.9%12.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 12.8%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos