Topic summary
97% 1 analyzed article/video 2,079 analyzed words
BS Summary: These False Narratives results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 1,767 hits . Analysis detected 10,316 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,237 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 64% (6,030 of 16,562 topics). This False Narratives is worse (more manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group. False Narratives
Topic details
Total words: 6,237
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.6% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 28.3% 28.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 16.3% 16.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 16.2% 16.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 28.3%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.9% Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.1% Tu Quoque: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst