Topic summary
⁠34%2 analyzed articles/videos759 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eye Care results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Indoctrination, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 562 hits. Analysis detected 3,478 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,102 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (11,920 of 16,266 topics). This Eye Care is better (less manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group.
Eye Care
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,102
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510026.7% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.6%6.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.5%5.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos