Topic summary
22% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,083 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Extreme Weather Events results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 1,961 hits . Analysis detected 18,818 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,516 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (12,414 of 15,690 topics). This Extreme Weather Events is better (less manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group. Extreme Weather Events
Topic details
Total words: 22,516
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles22.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst