Topic summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video1,207 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Extinction Events results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Pessimism Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 543 hits. Analysis detected 4,204 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,621 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,516 of 16,245 topics). This Extinction Events is worse (more manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group.
Extinction Events
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠60%Extinction Events (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,621
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510059.9% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 11.2%11.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.0%15.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.1%5.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.0%6.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos