Topic summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video3,373 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Extinction Crisis results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 940 hits. Analysis detected 7,894 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,119 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (13,559 of 16,076 topics). This Extinction Crisis is better (less manipulative) than 84.30% of the peer group.
Extinction Crisis
Topic details
Total words: 10,119
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510015.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.3%9.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos