Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video753 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Expulsion results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.3% saturation with 791 hits. Analysis detected 3,329 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,012 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,672 of 16,562 topics). This Expulsion is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Expulsion
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,012
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.7% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.0%14.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.7%17.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 26.3%26.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.7%4.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Special Pleading: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos