Topic summary
⁠11%2 analyzed articles/videos1,397 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Exploits results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Indoctrination, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 435 hits. Analysis detected 2,996 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,111 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (13,617 of 16,562 topics). This Exploits is better (less manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group.
Exploits
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,111
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

18% percentile
025507510017.8% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos