Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Exercising results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Optimism Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 256 hits. Analysis detected 2,082 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,183 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,236 topics). This Exercising is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Exercising
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,183
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.8%7.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.9%6.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos