Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video4,340 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Executive Prerogative results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 3,776 hits. Analysis detected 17,951 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (10,499 of 16,562 topics). This Executive Prerogative is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group.
Executive Prerogative
Topic details
Total words: 17,360
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles17.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.2%13.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos