Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 471 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Executive Nominations results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 41.4% saturation with 576 hits . Analysis detected 3,123 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,391 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 90% (1,749 of 16,562 topics). This Executive Nominations is worse (more manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group. Executive Nominations
Topic details
Total words: 1,391
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.4% percentile 8.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 41.4% 41.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 16.3% 16.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 18.1% 18.1% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 13.4% 13.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 12.3% 12.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 26.7% 26.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Special Pleading Sitewide 0.3% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 41.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 26.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.9% Special Pleading: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.3% Horn Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.9% Burden of Proof: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.4% Red Herring: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst