Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,633 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Executions results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 1,513 hits . Analysis detected 7,618 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,557 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 63% (6,127 of 16,562 topics). This Executions is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group. Executions
Topic details
Total words: 5,557
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.0% percentile 3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 27.2% 27.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 18.7% 18.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.3% 5.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 11.5% 11.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 27.2%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst