Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,095 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evolutionary Anthropology results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 437 hits . Analysis detected 2,496 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,380 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (13,781 of 15,765 topics). This Evolutionary Anthropology is better (less manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group. Evolutionary Anthropology
Topic details
Total words: 4,380
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst