Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,095 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Byrne results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 437 hits. Analysis detected 2,496 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,380 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 19% (5,182 of 6,359 authors). This Jennifer Byrne is better (less manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.
Jennifer Byrne
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
19%Jennifer Byrne (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,380
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

19% percentile
025507510018.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.7%0.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos