Topic summary
⁠13%1 analyzed article/video676 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evidence Withholding results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 229 hits. Analysis detected 1,243 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,704 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (12,711 of 16,562 topics). This Evidence Withholding is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group.
Evidence Withholding
Topic details
Total words: 2,704
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510023.3% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos