Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,142 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Everglades results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 913 hits. Analysis detected 5,975 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (5,031 of 16,562 topics). This Everglades is worse (more manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
Everglades
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,568
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.6% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.0%20.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.4%7.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.6%19.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.0%16.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.3%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos