Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video783 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evangelical Politics results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 42.1% saturation with 990 hits. Analysis detected 6,300 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,349 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,398 of 15,753 topics). This Evangelical Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 91.10% of the peer group.
Evangelical Politics
Topic details
Total words: 2,349
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510091.1% percentile
9.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 42.1%42.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 16.4%16.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 22.0%22.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 14.0%14.0%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 11.8%11.8%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 11.1%11.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 14.6%14.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 15.1%15.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 23.4%23.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 42.1%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 22.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 23.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 22.0%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Straw Man: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 0.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 4.6%Tu Quoque: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Personal Incredulity: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos