Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos3,369 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Euthanasia results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 1,706 hits. Analysis detected 12,631 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,672 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (12,304 of 16,562 topics). This Euthanasia is better (less manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Euthanasia
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 12,672
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510025.7% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.6%11.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos