Topic summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video205 analyzed words
BS Summary: These European Central Bank results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Unattributed Quote, and Pessimism Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 126 hits. Analysis detected 535 faulty-reasoning hits from 615 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (1,914 of 16,562 topics). This European Central Bank is worse (more manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group.
European Central Bank
Topic details
Total words: 615
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

88% percentile
025507510088.4% percentile
7.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles615 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 20.5%20.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 14.3%14.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.8%7.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.2%6.2%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 20.5%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 14.3%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos