Topic summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video520 analyzed words
BS Summary: These EU Relations results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 370 hits. Analysis detected 1,666 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,660 of 16,562 topics). This EU Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group.
EU Relations
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠72%EU Relations (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,560
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510071.9% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 23.7%23.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.1%5.1%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 23.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos