Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video504 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Etfs results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 617 hits. Analysis detected 2,346 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 82% (3,131 of 16,562 topics). This Etfs is worse (more manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group.
Etfs
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,016
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510081.1% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 30.6%30.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 26.3%26.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.9%7.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.5%6.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 30.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 26.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos