Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video536 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Etf Inflows results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 45.2% saturation with 727 hits. Analysis detected 4,081 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (864 of 16,562 topics). This Etf Inflows is worse (more manipulative) than 94.80% of the peer group.
Etf Inflows
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,608
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

95% percentile
025507510094.8% percentile
12.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 45.2%45.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 34.6%34.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 26.9%26.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 22.6%22.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 14.5%14.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 15.0%15.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.4%16.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 19.8%19.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 14.5%14.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Topic 45.2%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Topic 34.6%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 26.9%, sitewide 4.0%Framing Effect: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 22.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 15.0%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Bandwagon: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Gambler’s Fallacy: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos