Topic summary
74% 1 analyzed article/video 969 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Escalation Dynamics results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 436 hits . Analysis detected 3,731 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 65% (7,620 of 21,642 topics). This Escalation Dynamics is worse (more manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group. Escalation Dynamics
Topic details
Total words: 3,876
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.8% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 7.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst