Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos902 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Equal Time Rule results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 557 hits. Analysis detected 4,554 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,114 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,576 of 16,562 topics). This Equal Time Rule is worse (more manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.
Equal Time Rule
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,114
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510066.3% percentile
4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 11.3%11.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.9%17.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.6%10.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.4%9.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.6%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos